|
There are more things in heaven
and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
(Shakespeare's
Hamlet I.v. 174-175)

On the way to Saskatoon,
I took a picture of a wintering yard.
Some hives are in polystyrene boxes.
|
* * *
Travel Through Time -
Click here
* * *
- If you came here looking for
something specific, please scroll down, use your browser search (Ctrl+F), or look
here
-
- Is text on this page too large or small? Press "Ctrl" and
"+" or "Ctrl" and "-" at the same time to change it.- |
|
Do you have an ad blocker turned
on? Selected ads at right offer products and services related to topics on this
page.
|
Saturday 1 February 2003
Last year on
this date Year 2001 on this date
Year 2000 on this date
Write me
It's good to be home. I couldn't get
out of Saskatchewan fast enough, and I'm lucky I didn't get a speeding ticket
on the way out of there. I think I will leave Saskatchewan to their own
ways, and hope they will have the good grace not to interfere in ours.
The banquet was fun last night, but I quit early to get some rest. At
8:30, this morning, I awoke to the news that another space shuttle had fallen
apart. Not surprising, really; it's an experimental craft, and that
design is far from a mature concept. Just the same, it is a sad event and
a disappointment, perhaps even more so in these dark days when all talk is
about upcoming war(s). Since I got up late, I skipped breakfast and went to the
bear pit session to hear what the Saskatchewan beekeepers who are evaluating
Russian bee stock had to say.
By then, I was realizing that I was the only Alberta beekeeper
at the whole convention, and that I saw no one from BC, other provinces, or
the US (other than Dr. Caron). (I am not sure about Manitoba; my
understanding is that Tim Wendell operates in Manitoba, but I confess
ignorance on that point). I was starting to think that the
absence of outsiders was a little eerie, since in the past, quite a few
Alberta people made a point of going to Saskatchewan, and we welcomed
Saskatchewan people at our Alberta meeting last November. There had
also been a number of Alberta, and other out-of province, beekeepers at the
BC meeting Quesnel. In fact, I had been explicitly invited to speak in
BC and had most expenses paid, partially because they were hoping to better
understand and consider the views of Alberta beekeepers.
At the November ABA meeting in Alberta -- as I recall -- Saskatchewan
visitors had been given equal and ample opportunity with Alberta members to
express their views in full, and at length. We had also had a Manitoba
contingent in Edmonton, and they were heard respectfully. Hey, we even
had people from Hawaii and California, and they got to talk too. I
recall Kevin Ward and I had a bit of a heated exchange on the floor about the
idea of Alberta buying California packages. He was in favour and I expressed
concern, but I also recall that we all wound up in the bar together, and I
think Kevin bought my beer.
I also recall that Wink Howland went home and wrote in the Saskatchewan
newsletter that Alberta beekeepers were broken into cliques that do not speak
to one another. I have not seen that (and you know that I get around
and listen to everyone), but I can understand that he may have gotten that
impression, because he has judged incapable of listening, and people have
given up trying to talk to him and to the CHC.
People feel hurt, rebuffed and disenfranchised. In Alberta, the
Canadian Honey Council, which he represents, has lost respect and only a few
of us diehard optimists continue to pay dues. It is sad. There is
very serious breakdown when formerly strong supporters and officers of the
CHC, Jean Paradis and Barrie Termeer -- to name only two -- openly advocate
that Alberta leave the CHC. They have been forced to conclude that the
CHC is obstinately and actively working against the best interests of the
industry in Alberta, although CHC has been given every opportunity to see
that many of these questions are not either/or matters, and that all
interests can be accommodated.
I had noticed that, at this Saskatoon meeting, no one had been asked to give
greetings from Alberta, and I offered to do so, intending to invite the crowd
to be sure to come to Edmonton this Feb 20th and 21st for the IPM workshop.
Sure, it is a course for Alberta beekeepers, but the Alberta policy is to share
and share alike. I thought I'd say a few nice things and see about doing
a little bridge building.
That opportunity never came to pass. The bear pit
session went much as expected. It was largely self-congratulatory and
there was not much to say, really, except that the stock gave signs of being as
good as, or better than, the stock that the Saskatchewan beekeepers had
developed, plus it was expected to be hygienic and mite resistant. A
minority view was presented as well, by a beekeeper who has not adopted the
Russian stock yet, saying that it is still too early to say and that possibly
existing stock is better. Although all the real work had been done
by the USDA, and the USDA had generously and freely shared the stock with these
beekeepers, expecting nothing in return, the group was looking the gift horse
carefully in the mouth.
Then, Wink made some arrangements with the chair and Heather Clay stood up
and -- to my astonishment -- somewhat apologetically conveyed a request from
Medhat to consider supporting -- or at least not opposing -- the controlled
import of US queens from selected mainland US sources into Alberta --
under strict inspection and special protocols to ensure zero importation of any
varroa.
These protocols were considered necessary to placate the (somewhat
remote, but real) fear of getting doubly resistant mites. SHB
importation is not even a remote possibility when queens are alone in cages,
and the possibility of importing Africanized bees is not real, assuming that
the shippers are selected carefully. Moreover, the presentation by Dr.
Caron seemed to indicate that AHB acts very much like EHB in the extreme
areas of the temperate zone, so AHB may not be as big a concern as many have
thought.
The timing was awful, and what ensued was both a sad display of ignorance,
and of arrogant unconcern for an honest neighbours' opinions, welfare, genuine
needs and concerns. As someone who has no strong views on
the border issue (but does have strong views on open-mindedness and generosity
to others) and who has traveled and consulted widely to try to get a
perspective on this and other questions, I can see both sides of this question
and I see lots of room for compromise and co-operation. I am not inclined
to partisan politics, and like to examine and re-examine each issue carefully
on its merits. Any new perspective or reasoning I much appreciate
-- as you must know if you read these pages often.
At first, I could not believe my ears, but then I quickly gathered my things
and left, to avoid witnessing what appeared to be rapidly turning into a gang
beating. I drove from Saskatoon as quickly as I could. The road
conditions were slippery and foggy until I neared the Alberta border. As
Alberta drew close, the sun came out and the landscape again took on shape and
clarity. I have not been involved in any previous attempts to discuss the
border with an unreasoning, fanatic group -- or even suspected that my normally
pleasant friends to the east could be so insensitive and uncomprehending -- but
now I can understand why no other Alberta beekeepers were there. Some
might say that this is democracy, but that kind of democracy is like two wolves
and a sheep discussing what is for supper. Democracy, as I know it and
love it, takes into consideration the needs and wants of minorities.
At any rate, I have no idea what transpired after I left. Perhaps some
statesman, if there was a statesman in that assembly, pointed out that Alberta
had -- against Alberta's own interest -- reluctantly supported the neighbouring
provinces in the original border closure, even though families and businesses
were ruined or severely damaged in the process. Maybe someone pointed out
that there is no transshipment of bees between Alberta and Saskatchewan,
and that the areas where Alberta and Saskatchewan beekeepers come into contact
are very limited. Maybe someone pointed out that those areas of
Alberta are not a threat, since the beekeepers in those areas share similar
philosophies. Maybe someone pointed out that Alberta had spent $1,000,000
on stock development and that there are at least seven serious queen breeders
and producers in Alberta and more in BC, but there is still a large queen
deficit. Maybe someone pointed out that the imports could be restricted
to areas that are many hundreds of miles away from their operations and that
any concerns or risks to them would be managed carefully. Maybe someone
pointed out that there are Saskatchewan beekeepers paying huge sacrifices for
the provincial policies that benefit some, but punish others, but that they are
afraid to speak out.
If someone did say those things, it was not I. I was gone.
I had already discovered, in a resolution discussing the importation of more
USDA breeding stock, that the insights of outsiders are not welcomed in such
matters. I can usually bring estranged parties together and find common
points, but I know efforts are wasted, and even counterproductive, when people
are determined not to listen, and this group had its mind made up. I was
very disappointed in my friends. I was on the road, and I could not put
enough distance between that meeting and myself fast enough to suit me.
What I saw looked like a mob, and it was ugly. I hope these people come
to their senses and appreciate the generosity they have received from Alberta
and others in the past and what they are receiving freely from the USDA, an
agency of a country whose exports they are unconscionably blocking. I
hope they realize that trade is a two-way street and that they can't just be
takers for ever.
I know how much this queen question means to some people in Alberta.
Not to me, and not to the majority, but some people. In Alberta, we've
acknowledged this and compromised so that all can have a chance. In
Saskatchewan, apparently an inflexible fortress mentality prevails.
I'd been warned, but did not believe until I saw its ugly face today. My
Dad had an expression for what I saw today: "Dog in the manger", was all he'd
have said.
I can remember, years ago, when Alberta beekeepers and Saskatchewan
beekeepers were divided into irrational warring camps. The divide was
maintained by several manipulative individuals who used irrational ad hominem
arguments, fear and suspicion to drive people apart and to recruit followers.
At some point, as a group, most of us recognized what was happening and what
it was costing us in terms of cash and in terms of human dignity, and since
those days, most of us have learned to separate the people from the issues
and to all get along. We compromise and try to respect the
minority interests.
In fact, in this current situation, I'd say that most Alberta
beekeepers don't particularly want US mainland stock, and some are
self-sufficient, but in the large, they do respect and support -- or at least
do not oppose -- the minority that do need packages or queens and are
offended by those who do not acknowledge and accommodate the needs and tastes
of others. Most of us just don't understand keeping others from what
they need, especially if the cost to us is small. It is not in the
Alberta culture. By the large, we don't expect others to be like us and
to operate the way we choose to, want what we want. And, the corollary
to this is that, of course, I can't speak for all Alberta beekeepers, nor
would I wish to.
I try to be careful what I say here, and to present things in a positive
light. Maybe I'll get over this and re-write it tomorrow. Maybe
someone will tell me it is just a bad dream. Anyhow, I calls 'em
the way I sees 'em, and I want to make this clear: I don't dislike or
blame any of the people involved. I do think they are
suffering under a delusion, but I consider them friends. I want
very much to discuss the issues with them. I just hope they will consider
others for a change, quit being so selfish, listen carefully, and
compromise where it costs them nothing.
After all, the issue of importing queens to Alberta -- in really -- had
nothing to do with Saskatchewan. The request was merely a courtesy.
For Saskatchewan, the Alberta border on the west is every bit as closed to bee
transit as the US border on the south.
If anyone is wondering, no, I'm not mad and I don't hold grudges. I
just know when I'm in the wrong place. After years of beekeeping, I know
that if the bees are getting vicious, and smoke does not work, get out of there
and come back another time. Hope this applies to beekeepers, too. <G>.
Saturday..Becoming mainly cloudy near midday.
Wind west 20. High plus 5. Tonight..Cloudy with 60 percent chance of flurries.
Clearing overnight. Wind north 30 km/h diminishing to light. Low minus 7.
Normals for the period..Low minus 14. High minus 2.
Sunday 2 February 2003
Last
year on this date Year 2001 on this date
Year 2000 on this date
Write me
I awoke and looked for any messages telling me that I was wrong. There
are none. I refined my comments a bit and now will get on with life, a
little wiser and a little sadder. Anyhow, today we are expecting visitors
again. One is wanting a truck and another, to get started in bees.
Beyond that, our year-end was the 31st of January and I need to get things
in order for the accountant. I also need to discipline myself to turn out
a half-dozen articles. Yesterday I wrote 2,100 words for free. Now
I need to write some that are published, and which help bring home the bacon.
We also plan to go south sometime, and I have thought of going to see my family
in the East.
Although we have sold about half our hives, we still have about 1,600 hives
and if they do not sell soon, I will be running at least some of them again
this spring. If I have to take the winter loss and do any spring work, I
will keep them. We raised the price to $210 at the beginning of February,
and if we sell any in March or later, I expect the price will be up to $250.
That's what other sellers (and they are very few) have told me.
The consensus, that I have gathered from many sources, is that the
price of honey will remain in the $2 to $2.50 CAD ($1.30 to $1.60 US) region
for the next two years. One guesser (who has been very good at getting
top price) is banking on a spike to $3.00 CAD in the near future.
After that, quality assurance considerations may keep the honey produced
by superior managers well above the market, and buyers may be reluctant to
buy from uncertified sources at all, due to the risks of expensive
recalls, demands for HACCP and other guarantees from their downstream buyers,
and the increased pressure from improved and cheaper techniques for detection
of impurities.
Although not much honey is moving right now, the price seems firm above
$2 CAD, at about $2.20. The Argentine outlook is hard to pin down right
now, since it is early in their season, (February 1
in South America is comparable to August 1 in the northern hemisphere -- that
is often when we have just begun extracting) but there are no signs of a
bumper crop. For the most part, they are maintaining the price.
Okay. I got a phone call. Not to tell me I was wrong, exactly,
but to fill me in with a bit more info. I expect I'll get an email or two
which I'll share here, but I hope you'll understand if I withhold the names,
since I'm coming to understand that, in some places, those who practice free
speech can be punished. So, if you reply on this topic, I'll not reveal
your name -- unless you ask me to.
I also sold a truck this morning, one of the diesel one tons.
| Here's some comment on the Saskatchewan meeting:
I can only state personally that I am sorry for the treatment afforded you
by the SBA, however you were not alone as one of the SBA's own outgoing
directors was not mentioned as he had provided excellent work on behalf of
the SBA for several years. He did not stand for re-election and was not
thanked or even mentioned by the SBA for his service to them... Yes
Etiquette has to become part of the agenda for the SBA.
To talk to the point regard the last 20 minutes of the SBA convention...
my thoughts... Embarrassing! The current president of the Canadian Honey
Council should not have presented a half thought out discussion and put it
to the SBA for consideration without first hearing all the facts. This
TIMING was incredibly WRONG! Heather Clay was put on the spot to recite a
discussion that Medhat Nasr and herself had regarding the possibility of
bringing in US Queens to Alberta for the 20 to 30 thousand queen shortfall
seen each and every year. To most members of the SBA this issue is somewhat
"touchy" as it now raises the concerns as well as ALARMS are set off as to
how this shortfall is now being met? Ozzy Queens? New Zealand Queens ?
Hawaiian Queens?... or even worse the possibility of smuggled queens. Two
persons were caught at the US border and to my information, charges are
still pending and the case is continually being built. So as to the
question why now? One Saskatchewan beekeeper stood up and asked the chair
if this was just not a method of making the illegal smuggling of queens,
LEGAL?
This issue brought forth by the CHC delegate was hot on the heels of an
issue just discussed passionately about bringing purebred Russian Queens
into Saskatchewan rather than the proposed eggs and semen method adopted
by, ironically, Medhat Nasr. The emotions were high and the vote was
unanimous not to ask the membership to allow queens into Saskatchewan and
to follow the original motion of obtaining eggs and semen or whatever the
scientific terminology is for that. Not two minutes later, the CHC had
stood in front of the assembly minutes away from the conclusion of the
conference to again stir the issue of QUEENs, but now into Alberta... No
TIMING was poor as the discussion got out of hand, the MOB like sentiments
became apparent and yeah... it was sad to witness.
The issue in my opinion should never have been brought up by the CHC
without full disclosure as to the What, Why, Where how and whens were also
addressed.
You state in your diary too that this is an ALBERTA issue and not
relative to SASKATCHEWAN, I will disagree with you there. A few beekeepers
in the Porcupine Plain area of Saskatchewan have the dubious honour of
importing our current Varroa problem. This is not a guess either it is a
fact. These bees were being wintered in Southern BC, along side BC, and
Alberta bees... yepp that dang mite latched on to those Sask bees too... So
the current situation in Saskatchewan with a 30 % Varroa infestation rate
for the past 10 years, stems from a few operators that would not part with
the OLD ways of beekeeping and were malicious in writing their own
ticket... We all thank them NOT!
The talk at ABA conventions from beekeepers is that Porcupine Plain,
area wanting to sell US continental bees to Albertan's? Hmmmmm.... Are we
directly impacted? No, Indirectly..... In my opinion, definitely I believe
! So the issue of Alberta getting a legal foothold to getting Queens across
the US Canadian border is only seen as STEP ONE of a multi tiered process
to ultimately have Bees on Comb coming across. The US Canadian border is a
defended border the Alberta Saskatchewan border is not.... So once in, it
is felt that the domino effect takes place. Saskatchewan has bought time in
having to deal with the latest and greatest adversaries to beekeeping
effectively and efficiently... I believe that they are passionate in
defending that. And just perhaps that is why you had to witness the
militancy involved with that discussion.
What would I like to see? I think think that the mite is a more ugly
pest than we all admit... regardless of facts that having the mite is not a
Social disease... it is a fact, a problem and a common enemy that ALL
beekeepers have to look to the future to combat to the best of our
abilities. To sit on the sidelines and think this problem will go away is
shortsighted. I only hope that Medhat's idea was to include RUSSIAN queens
without resistant mites and without the next critical and perhaps lethal
dose or ??? whatever, that strikes down the bee industry. I think it is
agreed that the US normal stock bee are good, but they are also the primary
source of the most newest, grooviest and unwanted diseases going.
To speak to your uneasiness with the way the convention ended, you were
not alone and I hope that the SBA rethinks the way they conduct their
proceedings. I cannot apologize on behalf of the SBA, but I think that
beekeepers are beekeepers first and that politics are politics.... and when
the two get together... it never ends up being very predictable at all.
Cheers and Good Luck with your Retirement
... just a Saskatchewan beekeeper |
Well, I can see that people don't know, so I'll say right now that the
shortfall has been filled by smuggled queens for many years and further that
Saskatchewan is getting at least 5,000 of those, from what I hear. I've
heard much larger numbers, too. As for names and details I don't know,
since I am not in that loop, but I believe what I have heard from multiple
sources both in the US and Canada.
In regard to the Porcupine Plain folks, well, that is a Saskatchewan problem
and has nothing to do with Alberta. We got our mites the same way, but we
decided that, rather than make our beekeepers criminals, exiles or pariahs for
going about their normal business, we'd adapt. It cost us all a bit, some
more than others, but we still have our freedom and we all get along.
As for talk of the "OLD" way of beekeeping, that is the exact party line I
instantly got from Tim, when I mentioned casually that not everyone was
prospering in Saskatchewan's Brave New World. "OLD" and "New" are slogan
words, not words with rational meaning here. Trading in bees is just
another way of beekeeping, and one that makes the most of the natural
advantages found throughout a natural trading area.
How can people in Saskatchewan expect to receive expensive breeding stock
from the USDA and not even discuss fair trade with the USA and possible means
by which reasonable phytosanitary concerns can be met? That was
what the request was about; buying exports from the country that developed the
stock that Saskatchewan has been focusing on. It boggles a thinking man's
mind.
Not sure what you are saying about Porcupine Plain and continental bees.
As far as I can see, this is a straw man, and an excuse not to deal with the
simple facts and the situation at hand because the decision is too simple.
If Sask is having trouble controlling its own population, what is wrong?
Is it Alberta's freewheeling ways, or Saskatchewan's regime? There is
still a lot of this kind of illogic in the talk coming from Saskatchewan.
I suppose I could go on and argue, but then, I think I've made my point.
Some people will get it, and some won't. You see, I don't want to
change Saskatchewan. I, and other Albertans, would just like to see
Saskatchewan -- and a few other busybody provinces controlling the national
organization -- have the decency to butt out of Alberta's business. After
all, it was Saskatchewan people who broke Saskatchewan's embargo, not
Alberta people, and we don't want to send anything to Saskatchewan that
Saskatchewan does not want. Why would we?
Good neighbours mind their own business and don't try to tell one another
what to do. We respect and tolerate Saskatchewan and Saskatchewan ways,
and don't interfere in Saskatchewan doing as Saskatchewan pleases. Can
Saskatchewan respect and tolerate us? I'll need more proof than I saw
yesterday.
Anyhow... Thanks for the feedback. I appreciate the discussion.
| Here's more: When I stated the OLD ways... a
better term may have been the traditional ways... and traditional
disrespectful to the apiaries act in Saskatchewan. The law was broken and
that it was done in a way to snub authority. Rules and regulations are put
in place and meant for the good of the all and not just for the good of the
one! I state this in respect to the Porcupine Plain incident. |
Okay. I can see we have philosophical differences. I think it
may be fair to say that Saskatchewan tends to be socialist and collectivist in
its thinking, and that Alberta tends to be libertarian. In Alberta,
we the beekeepers make the laws and then decide whether we need to enforce
them. Usually, we decide we don't. We do have laws, but I cannot
remember the last prosecution. Matters are settled by group discussion,
arm wrestling, moral suasion, and co-operation, rather than enforcement.
I think Medhat is going to fit right in. He has said he does not want to
be an enforcer, and I am sure his charm and powers of reason will ensure
continued peace and co-operation.
I understand the decision that Saskatchewan, made and the obvious benefits
that have come from it. What is much less apparent and not a polite
subject for discussion in Saskatchewan -- apparently -- is:
- the costs of that decision, in terms of lost freedom and lost profits,
- who has paid and who continues to pay the cost -- and
- at what point the embargo should end.
Moreover, it seems that Saskatchewan somehow feels so smug and superior that
its values and laws should influence what Albertans do in their own province.
In Alberta, we decided to go a different path and share the costs and benefits
differently. Who is/was right and who was wrong is not a meaningful
question. Our values are just different. We've handled everything
that has come along so far and we believe we can handle anything else that is
on the horizon, if we can work with our American partners. We are free
traders and fair traders. We just wish to be -- as our constitutional
allies, the Quebecois, say -- "maitres chez nous".
I suppose at this time, it might be a good idea to mention the existence of
the Canadian Commercial Honey
Producers Association and to suggest that those Western Canadian beekeepers
who feel that CHC is
working against their interests and violating their provincial rights, consider
joining and supporting this new group. Here's what the CCHPA says:
"What we hope to accomplish
through this organization is to turn the attitude of the honey producing
/pollinating industry into a “striving for prosperity” mode verses the
current “striving to survive” mode."
The new group held a meeting in Saskatoon, I think, last fall, and I have
not heard the outcome. I was away, and did not attend. Although
Brent and I spent some time together at Niagara touring wineries, I neglected
to ask about that.
I have not thus far joined the CCHPA personally, but am now reconsidering
diverting my support from the CHC to CCHPA.
Today..Becoming mainly sunny this morning.
Wind light. High plus 2. Tonight..Partly cloudy. Wind light. Low minus 9.
Normals for the period..Low minus 14. High minus 2.
Monday 3 February 2003
Last year on
this date Year 2001 on this date
Year 2000 on this date
Write me
We've sold off enough hives now that I am not worried about the rest. We
still have a few, plus trucks and forklifts, to sell. I have a buyer
coming tomorrow to make a deal on 200. That takes us down to 1,600.
We can let more go, but the pressure is off.
As for about 800-1,200 of the remaining balance, it looks as if we will set
up a new company, take on a partner and step back to simply managing the
business during transition. We're working on the details -- but assuming
this works out, it'll be the best of both worlds. I'll still be involved
in the business, but be able to step back over time from the day-to-day.
The deal is, of course, not completely put together, and subject to all the
usual last minute problems, but it appears likely to fly.
If we are approached for more hives before the deal is cemented, we may sell
more now, for cash, but we'll see. We have options. It is looking
more and more as if there will be a feeding frenzy coming up as beekeepers
discover that honey prices are rising, not falling, and that they are short of
bees.
|
Australian packages for this spring are
still in question. Even if the authorities continue to permit
import of Australian packages -- which might appear to be preferential
treatment over the US, now that SHB is in Oz and varroa in NZ -- there is
the question of air transport.
Apparently the newer planes can't carry bees in the same way that the
wide body planes did. I'm not sure of the details -- I guess I
should have listened a bit better -- but that is a problem, along with
the inability of shippers to book the space in advance, pending
decisions. The shippers don't know whether it is go or no-go,
either, so some will undoubtedly decide it is not worth the hassle.
Add to that the buoyancy in the Australian dollar, and the increased
landed price and the uncertainty of receiving packages alive, if at all,
and there could be a huge price squeeze when everyone realizes at once
that they have lost bees over winter due to canola honey reserves from
the late canola bloom, and that they cannot get any replacements.
Last year, even without the current problems, many beekeepers went
without package bees. Some Australian packages 'burned up' in
shipment, and other orders were simply not filled by the suppliers.
Of those that did get Australian packages, some complained about the
queens and some beekeepers even replaced them all.
An added consideration -- even if Canada allows Australian packages --
is whether restrictive jurisdictions like Saskatchewan will permit them
entry due to the lack of assurance that SHB will not ride in them.
Further, even if the provinces permit them entry, will individual
beekeepers wish to take a chance on getting a new pest?
If the same rules and reasoning are applied to Australian and New
Zealand imports that are applied to the mainland USA, Canadian
authorities are faced with some tough decisions. Already there are
questions being openly asked about favouritism and anti-Americanism.
If Canada is willing to trade with countries known to have pests and
which do not have resistant stock, how can Canada in good conscience
refuse to consider importation of high quality stock from our best
friends and closest neighbours?
So far there has been no strong pressure by the US to open the
Canada/US border, but these recent events may tip the scales.
Already some Canadian provinces have expressed a |
willingness to import US
stock -- variously packages, queens or breeding stock -- if protocols can
be worked out to ensure safety from known hazards. This seems
possible, but the only obstacle is political. The current structure
of the industry in Canada is such that distant and/or unaffected
provinces can, and do, capriciously block the legitimate desires of other
provinces. The argument is made that if any mainland US bees are
allowed into any part of Canada, they must be allowed into all.
That is obvious poppycock, since the US border was closed in two stages,
in different years. Moreover, jurisdictions like Saskatchewan currently
block import of any bees they wish to block, including bees from
Alberta. Saskatchewan even controls movement of bees within the
province. Other provinces do not chose to do so.
Province by province relaxation of the embargo is entirely possible,
but uninformed arguments and fear mongering have drowned out
rational discussion. Even intelligent and well-intentioned people
are distracted by lies, half-truths and propaganda from those who benefit
by limiting trade or controlling others and limiting industry growth.
The simple fact is that the requirements, the opportunities, the
shortages, and the risks are not at all uniform throughout Canada.
The current situation pits the local interests and concerns of each
province against those of other provinces, and pits region against
region. The available resources, length of season and and climate vary
widely. There is no 'one size fits all' solution, nor should
there be. This is not legitimately a federal question, but rather a
provincial, or even local one.
Those provinces or localities that wish to stay isolated can do so
without forcing others to do so, assuming that they can maintain the
co-operation of their local populations -- local solutions for
local problems.
There is no current justification for closing the entire
Canada/US border to satisfy one region or another. Let each
province set its own rules. If we can import packages from some
regions of Australia and not others under controls agreed by the parties
directly involved, then obviously we can import bees from some parts of
the US mainland to some parts of Canada and not others.
Any other conclusion is dishonest. |
| This just in, after I wrote the above... Dr. Samira
Belaissaoui - Canadian Food inspection Agency, (CFIA), Heather Clay -
Canadian Honey Council (CHC) and Doug McRory - Canadian Association of
Professional Apiculturists, (CAPA) have just completed a conference call
at 12:15 P.M., Friday January 31, 2003 about the above subject. The
following conditions were agreed to by Heather Clay representing (CHC)
and Doug McRory (CAPA) and are as follows:
- that the shipping beekeeping establishment's bee yards are all
free of Small Hive Beetles and they shall be located at least 25
kilometers from any known finds of Small Hive Beetles.
- in the case of queen bees, they shall be fresh caught and not
banked before shipment.
- Australian honey bee inspection will inspect all locations for
Small Hive Beetles from which either queens or package bees are to be
shipped to Canada within 30 days prior to shipment.
It is critical that the Import permits be made available to Canadian
importers as soon as possible so that arrangements can be made to in fact
obtain the bees.... |
| and this... ...Regarding spread of the beetle
and the rationale for an exclusion zone, we are thinking in terms of the
beetle's flight distance rather than "artificial" spread with movement of
infested hives. The honey industry in Australia is quite mobile and moves
hives over large distances - to the extent that a 25 or even 40 km
exclusion zone would be almost irrelevant. The distances covered here
would appear to be much greater than what you describe for Canada. As
mentioned above there are
currently no compulsory movement restrictions but apiarists are under
considerable peer pressure to avoid moving infested hives.
Regarding queens with escorts in cages, it would be feasible for a
government apiary officer to have inspected the source apiary within the
previous 30 days. However, given the seasonal nature of the trade and the
tight time frame for preparation of shipments, we would not have
government resources to inspect each individual queen and escorts -
we would propose to rely on a
signed declaration from the owner/manager that they have examined
each cage at the time of packing and found no evidence of small hive
beetle.
Gene sequencing work has been done on the Australian strain of small
hive beetle. The work was done in the light of a US study on a large
sample (some 140) of strains there which showed that broadly, the USA has
two source strains of small hive beetle.
The sequence found here was
dissimilar to the US strains but identical to a strain found in
Durban, South Africa, which had previously been characterised. For that
reason, we suspect that the Australian beetle originated from southern
Africa somewhere. These differences are are of limited to the genetic
sequences. We are aware of some
misinformed discussion that the beetle in Australia is "a
different variety" from the US beetle but this is not true.
We do not have sufficient
information to determine whether the Australian strain is more or less
damaging than the US strains. The amount of damage from small hive
beetle seen here seems to be less than that reported in Florida in recent
times but it is too early to confirm! this subjective observation...
The highlighting is mine. I don't understand why, if the
discussion was indeed misinformed about the beetle being different, why
the writer then continues to refer to the 'US strains' and speculate as
to the differences in destructiveness.
I am not a biologist and am uncertain of the technical differences
between a 'strain' and a 'variety'. I thought I'd look the words
up.
Variety \Va*ri"e*ty\,
n.;
pl. {Varieties}. [L.
varietas:
cf.
F.
vari['e]t['e].
See {Various}.(Biol.)
An
individual,
or
group
of
individuals,
of
a
species
differing
from
the
rest
in
some
one
or
more
of
the
characteristics
typical
of
the
species,
and
capable
either
of
perpetuating
itself
for
a
period,
or
of
being
perpetuated
by
artificial
means;
hence,
a
subdivision,
or
peculiar
form,
of
a
species.
Geographical
variety} (Biol.),
a
variety
of
any
species
which
is
coincident
with
a
geographical
region,
and
is
usually
dependent
upon,
or
caused
by,
peculiarities
of
climate.
Strain \Strain\,
n. (Hort.)
A
cultural
subvariety
that
is
only
slightly
differentiated.
(biology)
a
group
of
organisms
within
a
species
that
differ
in
trivial
ways
from
similar
groups; "a
new
strain
of
microorganisms" [syn: {form}, {variant}, {var.}]
It appears that these are technical biologist's words and the report
was made in lay terms, so I can see there is a subtle technical
confusion, but I still don't get the point. The beetles are visibly
different, and the other differences unknown. Moreover there are no
controls on bee movement in the area in question and people are free to
move bees around. 25 km is nothing in terms of distance.
| If we were talking about the continental US here, what
would be happening? The US can guarantee much larger
separations, inspections and certifications on at least some
exports and yet, every time there has been a suggestion of a
limited, controlled importation of US bees, the same Canadian
powers that are rushing to condone this risky importation of
Australian stock stymie the effort.
I ask you now, what are the possible motivations for
such behavior?
Here we see that there are no controls, the distances are
short, we know that Aussies are a macho, independent lot, and move
bees all over the place and, moreover, the only assurance is on the
honour system.
What's wrong with this picture, kids? Let's play
fair -- with everyone! |
|
I don't know if anyone has tried the Panda online
scan at the bottom of this page, but I highly recommend it. It does not
cost, and, of course, I do not get anything out of your using it. It is
just an excellent free service. I'll bet it finds something on your
machine. I'm curious. Please let me
know.
FWIW, here's the report from the first scan I did
on this new computer!
Incident Status Location
Bck/IRC.Ricker
Disinfected C:\Documents and Settings\Allen\My Documents\New
Files\registry.exe
Bck/IRC.Ricker
Disinfected C:\Documents and Settings\Allen\My Documents\New
Files\Sequoia.exe
EICAR-AV-TEST-FILE
Disinfected C:\P2\DC\Test.___________
W32/MTX Disinfected
C:\P2\DC\Windows\Profiles\allend\Application
Data\Mozilla\Users50\allend\jvpsngl0.slt\Mail\mail.i n t e r n o d e
.net\Outlook Mail.sbd\Personal Folders.sbd\Deleted Items[HANSON.SCR]
W97M/Marker.AO
Disinfected C:\P2\DC\Windows\Profiles\allend\Application
Data\Mozilla\Users50\allend\jvpsngl0.slt\Mail\mail.i n t e r n o d
e.net\Outlook Mail.sbd\Personal
Folders.sbd\Inbox.sbd\Apicultura[Vaselina.zip][Vaselina I.doc]
W97M/Marker.AO
Disinfected C:\P2\DC\Windows\Profiles\allend\Application
Data\Mozilla\Users50\allend\jvpsngl0.slt\Mail\mail.i n t e r n o d
e.net\Outlook Mail.sbd\Personal Folders.sbd\Inbox.sbd\Inbox
History[timetabl.doc]
W97M/Marker.AO
Disinfected C:\P2\DC\Windows\Profiles\allend\Application
Data\Mozilla\Users50\allend\jvpsngl0.slt\Mail\mail.i n t e r n o d
e.net\Outlook Mail.sbd\Personal Folders.sbd\Inbox.sbd\Inbox
History[timetabl.doc]
Exploit/iFrame
Disinfected Local Folders\Inbox\Re: Ismap alt
Some of these files were in imported archives from
an old machine, and only the iframe exploit was active, but I thought that this
is pretty darn good... and the scan disinfected the files too. I was a
bit sad to see the EICAR test file
disinfected, but what the heck. The scan is thorough, I'll give it that.
It's noon, and it is snowing. Paulo came in
earlier and went to Meijers to sample all the drums that Dennis had failed to
sample when we they were filling them.
I've recently reduced my involvement in BEE-L,
and I've taken my comments about my experience at the Saskatchewan meeting
off this page. I'm beginning to understand something I never could
quite understand before, and that is why the rational people and those with
the most knowledge and background and experience -- and who actually
understand the issues -- often (usually) stay out of the public side of
industry debates. I've seen this on BEE-L and I've seen it at meetings,
and been puzzled by that fact. I think I have it figured out now.
|
Leroy is coming tomorrow to buy some hives and
so Ellen & I decided we'd better go take a look first. I'd hate to
take him out and have a big surprise. The only hives I've looked in
in the past month are several that were left behind when we sold a yard and
moved it out, and the ones that are in the north yard and were made up from
honey house window bees. They hadn't looked too wonderful, so I was
starting to wonder (worry).
We drove to three yards and every hive of the
twenty or so we looked into were absolutely top notch. None of them
are all the way up yet, so they have lots of feed. It breaks my
heart to sell them, the bees are so good, and the value of the honey in
them alone is almost worth the price. Many are wintering on honey,
since they did not take much feed last fall. One cluster was a bit
small, but I could tell by looking at the bees that they are just fine.
We did see one dead hive, but it had been
marked as dead last fall. I suspect it was only a handful of bees
when it was wrapped. At any rate, we were quite cheerful on returning
home, assured that, unless something happens, we are looking at normal loss
or less. Right now I can't see more than 1%, but by May 10 to 15%
loss is normal.
The hives shown here are made of expanded
polystyrene. We transferred the bees into them very late last fall.
I was a bit concerned about disrupting them that late, but we simply
inverted the brood boxes, pushed the entire mass of frames out of
each box, and slid the new box down over, then set them upright and placed
them on the new stands. So far they look good, and clusters might be
just a little looser than in the wooden boxes. |
Almonds are blooming in California. Here's where to go to
follow the bloom.
| Speaking of Oz, here's a
nice feedback note I got from down under Tuesday February 04, 2003
12:20 AM
Hi Allen,
Took your advice, and scanned my computer hard disk using
Panda......enormous number of files checked.....no viruses found. Then ran
scan on my email. 9 viruses found and disinfected....all in deleted items.
(2 were in BEE-L mailings) . I'm sure most of these were detected by AVG at
the time in attachments and I received a warning, which is why I deleted
them. So why are they still in there? As you can see I'm no computer whizz,
( I'm a beekeeper...I have to use that excuse frequently these days!). So
how does one actually delete items so they are totally gone, and not
lurking around in the background somewhere, waiting to surface when one
least expects it and crash the system?
I enjoy reading your diary, because its SO different to the beekeeping
we do here in Western Australia. I was alarmed to read your report about
finding varroa in packages from Oz when you first noted it and again when
you mentioned it again recently. You may not have elicited any public
response, but believe me we all scurried off to look for the little
critters!!! Found nothing and still finding nothing. Your comments re
Hygienic bees have been taken to heart here in the west, and some of us are
trying hard to lift our game in selecting for these characteristics. The
logistics are somewhat more difficult for us I suspect, but we'll get
there.
Hope you enjoy your retirement, but from recent entries, it doesn't
sound like a real retirement to me!!!
| Thanks, mate Appreciate the feedback. As for
those items, I think AVG quarantines them, but lets you decide if you
want to flush them. There is something called the 'virus
vault', where it segregates them. You can go there from the
Program | Virus_Vault menu and look at them -- and kill them, or just
run Panda again with the 'Clean' check box checked. (I think).
I'm glad you did not find varroa. You don't need it.
I've been pleased to find that they have not been nearly as bad as
expected here, but maybe it is just dumb luck.
As for HYG bees, I'm glad you are working in that direction.
The bees I got from Aus have mostly been great, except in that one
regard. A few generations of selection should work wonders.
Not only should you get rid of the chalkbrood (I had up to 30% in
some Aus stock), but it will be the real keystone in eliminating AFB
forever. Your overseas customers will enjoy the benefits too.
We're seeing much more HYG here in domestic and Hawaiian stock,
and much less AFB. I suspect that with universal attention to
that trait, that AFB may become a rarity, even in this part of the
world.
As for retirement, it terrifies me as it gets closer and
closer. I may cut back, but I cannot imagine getting completely
out.
Thanks for writing.
allen |
|
We drove to Drumheller and joined Oene and Joe at the 'Fred and Barney's'
(Chinese) restaurant for supper .
Today..Cloudy. 30 percent chance of flurries.
Wind light. High minus 1. Tonight..Mainly cloudy. Wind becoming north 20 km/h.
Low minus 7. Normals for the period..Low minus 13. High minus 2.
Tuesday 4 February 2003
Last
year on this date Year 2001 on this date
Year 2000 on this date
Write me
Leroy and Jerry came by this morning, and Leroy looked over the hives he is
buying. We did the deal today, and he'll pick them up in March, after the
chance of a major cold snap is lower. We're concerned that they might be
damaged if they are stimulated by moving, then immediately subjected to nasty
weather.
We had a good visit and lunch, then they were on their way. Our price
is at $210 each for doubles, as-is, where-is. We'll remove any obvious
duds at this point, but otherwise, buyers take all the hives in the yard.
I'm told the price in March/April others are asking is $250. We'll see.
Next month -- assuming we still want to sell some -- we expect to be asking
$230.
Here's a note from a regular contributor who has
-- in the past -- proven to have his finger on the pulse of the US
industry:
It was 65 degrees at the farm Saturday & #1 son was very pleased when
walking into bee yards as to the amount of bee flight from every hive. We
have had almost no winter loss & with the equipment we have sent to Texas
for singles, the facts have hit home in realization that we are going to
run out of supers real fast when spring rolls around.
I thought it would be smart to pre pay for queens & get them reserved
& I am glad I did. Seems from what I am hearing some queen & package
people are reducing the size of operations & are either leasing there
bees out for honey production. Or just cutting back to eliminate the
hired help headache. If the border was to open back up to the north for
packages & queens I would be surprised if the states could meet the
demand.
Allen, as I have told you in the past that years ago I found it a heck
of a lot easier to know that you have the mites & learn to deal with them
as to worry as to when they would arrive. With the stock we use I only
have to treat for varroa. The other mite is no longer a problem. And from
the looks of some of the bottom boards almost all the mites viewed under
a microscope are missing at least 2 legs & some are missing more. I may
not treat for varroa in the not to near future.
As I've said, varroa has proven to be a minor threat here, but I know
that some Alberta beekeepers have been unable to manage them. Others
may not even treat, or treat very minimally, since their management systems
are based on annual splitting and gassing of the old colonies. I understand
these latter people winter in the warm parts of BC, however. |
| Here is another aspect of the package
bee question. Whether you happen to favour Australian packages or US
packages, or neither, this is food for thought. Bob is writing about
opening the US to import of Australian bees. He has a
history of shooting from the hip, but seems to hit somewhere near the
target often enough to be taken seriously. Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002
07:20:55 -0600
Reply-To: <BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM>
Sender:
BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
From: Bob Harrison <busybeeacres@DISCOVERYNET.COM>
Subject: Re: Feelings Of Insecurity about Bee Biosecurity
Hello All, Package bee sellers in the U.S. have spread mites, SHB and
many other beekeeping problems far greater than the migratory beekeeper
ever did (in my opinion) but blaming the migratory beekeeper kept the heat
off the package seller .
The package bee seller knew the migratory beekeeper could care less
about public opinion and would not rebuke the blame.
This year the problem of packages infested with varroa has been so bad
that many package buyers had their hives so infested by fall the hives were
over threshold. Every SHB find in Missouri has been traced back to packages
from a package seller.
Our U.S. queen and package sellers can easily supply the U.S. needs.
Why import future problems? Let us keep our borders shut and hope the
package sellers( NOT ALL ) in the U.S. which are shipping packages around
the country with high loads of varroa and SHB read my post and *hear* from
each beekeeper which received SHB or a package with a high varroa load.
A package from a hive which has a low varroa load should not reach
threshold in August! Many commercial beekeepers have never bought a mite
strip. They simply bought packages and depopulated the hives in the fall.
Lately they are finding their hives over threshold before the end of the
season. The reason is the packages are heavily varroa infested when
installed.
If we cannot keep packages coming out of the south with SHB and high
varroa loads how are we to keep new beekeeping problems from coming in from
outside our borders. Especially when those breeders are on the honor
system?
Bob |
I'm trying to keep somewhat neutral on this whole
matter. After all, I actually am in a position where I personally
benefit from the closed border because I am selling bees, and the
closure keeps the price of bees and equipment artificially high!
Anyhow, here is an interesting note:
Hello Allen;
Read with interest your earlier comments about the Sask meeting
shortly before heading off to the Manitoba meeting. They are a
protective bunch in Sask. Wink was in Manitoba, asked how many
Manitoba beekeepers would support Alberta's request for the possible
importation of queens from the U.S. this spring'. Got a
negative response.
It seems our board of directors elected last Nov. is only an interim
board, subject to an government review of our election process. This
having something to do with the voters list and possible ineligible
voters elected a pro open border board! The politics of beekeeping.
I personally think the only reason the border was closed and remains
closed is that some bureaucrat wants to cover his ass in case the African
bee arrives in Canada. I remember Don Peer saying "the border is
closed, never to be opened again.". Must BE SOMETHING IN THE WATER
IN SASK TO MAKE A BEEKEEPER THINK LIKE THAT.
Your site remains a daily stop, good information. Keep up the
good work. Thank you for the info and your insights.
And thank you!
I enjoyed these comments. I think that Medhat's intent was
actually to sound out the idea informally, and develop workable scenarios,
not to take it --cold and unformed -- to the floor where surprised and
alarmed beekeepers would predictably react with hostility to the new and
foreign-sounding idea, since, on first blush, it sounds so much like an
idea they have been opposing.
|
Don Peer
I recall, some 33 years ago, when I was first about to set up
beekeeping in Alberta, writing Dr. Peer asking advice on my (somewhat
simplistic and idealistic) plans. He wrote back a long and very
thoughtful letter explaining where I would go wrong, and how I could
make my plan work.
I've never forgotten that, and if there is one experience that
has caused me to want to share what I have learned in beekeeping --
once I got to the point where I had something worth sharing --
it is that example of neighborliness to a (stupid?) unknown kid in
Alberta by Dr. Peer, whom I had never met at that time.
I did meet him later on a number of occasions, and know he was
a man of strong opinions, and some of his opinions I could not
support. I guess I learned something from that too.
Nonetheless, I always did respect him.
We sometimes forget that we are all very close and
interdependent in this industry. Only a tiny, tiny percentage
of the population in this world cares much for bugs, especially
prickly ones, so we have that one thing in common and must stick
together. I realize that we beekeepers often come down on
different sides of issues, and sometimes there are rigid positions
and examples of destructive behaviour, but through all that the fact
remains that we beekeepers are like family. In some ways we are
even closer.
When we allow ourselves to be driven by fears and ignorance and
propaganda and rigid positions, we all lose. When we take the
time to get together and consider the facts, and put aside our own
fears and problems and understand the legitimate needs and concerns
of others, and compromise a bit, we are able to accomplish a lot. |
|
Today..Cloudy with a 30 percent chance of
early morning flurries then a mix of sun and cloud. Wind northwest 20 km/h.
High minus 1. Tonight..Mainly cloudy with 60 percent chance of flurries
towards morning. Wind northwest 20. Low minus 4. Normals for the
period..Low minus 13. High minus 1.
Wednesday 5 February 2003
Last
year on this date Year 2001 on this date
Year 2000 on this date
Write me
| This note is in response to the criticisms from Saskatchewan that
Alberta does not raise queens, etc. Hi Allen,
There are fifteen longtime queen producers in the Peace River area
that I am familiar with. The exact numbers produced no doubt varies from
year to year. I have left out some producers who have raised queens in
the past and have quit, and I no doubt left out some newer beekeepers
with whom I am unfamiliar. The fifteen that I know produce between 25,000
and 30,000 queens on any given year.
The Edmonton area produces roughly 2,500 queens according to local
sources. Northeast Alberta may not produce as many queens, but this area
has some very good queen producers as well.
I would estimate that the province produces 35,000 to 40,000 queens on
an annual basis. I don't know of anyone in Southern Alberta, but I am
sure that some must be produced there. |
| An importer of Australian packages comments: Hi Allen: I
thought I'd let you know that the Australian package and queen suppliers
have yet to receive an official response from the Canadian authorities.
The delays are causing them some concerns. CFIA told me to apply for an
import permit in a couple more days.
Things are starting to finally get lined up. Korea purchases many
packages from Australia starting in mid-February. Apparently they are
sending a delegation to Australia.
We should try to keep an eye on that, and see if they accidentally
import SHB. |
| I continue to get correspondence resulting from my comments on the
Saskatchewan meeting. I have discovered that the philosophical and
political differences between liberal (in the
classical sense of the word, not in the Canadian political sense)
Alberta and authoritarian Saskatchewan are not easily resolved, but this
came up in the discussion. It makes me very sorry that I did not
continue on to Manitoba... --- begin report ---
One astonishing statement made at the convention was the use of
coumaphous on Apistantm resistant mites.... had the biggest
affect on honey production.... less than one third the honey from a
Checkmite+ tm treated colony to an untreated colony.
And the bad news continued... queen problems brood size and winter
cluster size were possible results of the coumaphous treatment...
The statement was made by Rob Currie and is part of the information
going into the emergency certification of Checkmite in Canada. So the
study... ummm what is done is done. The results stand for themselves.
Like I stated this study that he had presented IS the study that will
go to the appropriate Gov of Canada departments. It was his power point
graphs that clearly showed this fact. It was tHis who had stated the
cluster sizes etc.. and there smallness in comparison to untreated
colonies. I can comment no further just hope that he too will be in
Edmonton.
--- end report --- |
I've since heard from Rob that the above report is pretty much all based on
misunderstanding and I will publish Rob's comments if I get permission to do
so.
Today..Occasional snow. Wind north 30 gusting
50 km/h giving blowing snow in open areas. Wind diminishing to north 20 this
morning. High minus 1 this morning then temperature falling. Tonight..Mainly
cloudy. 60 percent chance of flurries. Wind light. Low minus 8. Normals for the
period..Low minus 13. High minus 1.
Thursday 6 February 2003
Last
year on this date Year 2001 on this date
Year 2000 on this date
Write me
This page is getting HUGE. I need to take time from it and get a life.
Thing is, though, I love writing and thinking, then rewriting and
rethinking. In the process of writing and sharing the writing, I learn
a lot about myself. I remember back to when I started, I was awful.
when I re-read my work a while later, I'd shudder. But...
practice makes perfect, and now, when I look back on what I've written, I
usually feel a little pride. Not all the time, though. Often I
find logical holes or bad syntax. Sometimes I just rip it up.
Nonetheless, most of the time, I'm saying what I want to say, the way I want
to say it.
That's not to say that I do not write and rewrite. I rewrite
constantly. Without a word processor, my work would be gibberish.
I truly often wonder how I am able to make myself understood when I talk,
when I consider how carefully and how often I have to refine and revise what
I write to make it say what I truly mean, and no more. As an
example, I just rewrote that last sentence and modified it at least ten times
just now, and I may revise it again tomorrow.
Not only that, I can't type. I did learn years ago, then got a
Commodore Pet in the late seventies it had a 'Chicklet' miniature keyboard
and my typing has never been the same. Dave Green watched me typing at the ABF
meeting in Virginia a few years back and marveled that I got anything written
at all. He described watching me as 'painful'.
Yesterday I started exercising again. I did a mile on the treadmill
and some weight training. It can be hard to get started, but once
underway, exercise is invigorating; I can notice a change of mood and increase
in energy during, and for some time afterwards. I've been less
careful what I put in my mouth lately, and am starting to pay the price.
I'm at 242 when I weigh and my belt is out two notches, plus I'm noticing some
joint pain. I think the latter is diet-related. I suspect white
flour, but I know that alcohol has an effect on my immune system. The
occasional drink does not seem to matter, but, with all the meetings lately,
I've been less temperate than I like to be.
Paulo has been coming in to work this week, tidying and sampling honey and
wax drums. We have a load and a half here still, and also 60 drums of wax
and cappings. They have to go somewhere sometime soon. I'm planning
to send the wax to Paradis Honey.
We haven't called Dennis in, since we are to busy to spend time in
constant supervision. As for Dave, we have not heard from him since
December.
Today..Sunny. Wind light. High plus 5.
Tonight..Partly cloudy. Wind northwest 20 km/h. Low minus 5. Normals for
the period..Low minus 13. High minus 1.
Friday 7 February 2003
Last
year on this date Year 2001 on this date
Year 2000 on this date
Write me
Ellen discovered some broken frames yesterday and we brought in Dennis today to
get that job done. Hopefully he and Paulo will be able to get all the wax
ready for pickup early next week.
Bill mentioned the other day that Opera 7.01, the final release version, is now
out for free download. I had quit using Opera after the 7 beta came out
and I found it was not quite like the Opera 6, which I liked. I went back
to MSIE for a while. Yesterday, I downloaded the release and installed my
key (I purchased Opera some time back). Wow! It is fast and good.
I love the interface, but I did change the skin to a compact button set.
The factory skin is a bit big and clunky. I haven't finished testing the
java and javascript yet, but so far it looks good -- far better than before.
I was finding MSIE very slow, and Opera is blindingly fast compared to IE.
|
Allen's
Links
of the Day
|
|
Today..Increasing cloud. 60 percent chance of
flurries this afternoon. Wind increasing to north 30 gusting 50 km/h. High plus
3 then temperature falling this afternoon. Tonight..Cloudy with occasional
snow. Wind north 20. Low minus 7. Normals for the period..Low minus 13.
High minus 1.
Saturday 8 February 2003
Last
year on this date Year 2001 on this date
Year 2000 on this date
Write me
The RCR snow report just arrived via email. At 5:25 this AM (now) there
are 20 cms (8 in) fresh snow overnight at Nakiska. Excellent. I
feel like going to BC and Nakiska is along the way, BUT I have some fairly
pressing things stacked up here to do, and I still have some procrastination to
finish before I get to them. What to do?
I went back to bed. I'll get a few things done here today.
promise!
The market for honey slowed for a while, and I guess the Argentine crop
is still unknown; Feb 8 in the Argentine is like Aug 8 here, and still early
for a good estimate. Nonetheless, prices continue firm. A broker told me
yesterday that he had turned down an offer to purchase at $1.60 US in
expectation of higher prices. Meanwhile, a number of Canadian packers are
meeting in Ottawa and I'm told that, among other things, they are trying to
figure out how to limit and reduce the prices paid to beekeepers. Over this
past season, the offers from those in that group have been amazingly similar
from one to another, but I know they would not be price fixing, because that
would be illegal.
With better communication between beekeepers, buyers are finding it
tough to fool the beekeepers and it is worrying them. Some of these buyers
still manage to find a few beekeepers who are out of touch and buy cheap --
I've seen it happen -- but with the internet and hotlines like the Mid-US
hotline (1-763-658-4193) more beekeepers know what the market price is, and
the old tricks do not work as well.
Claims of retail buyer resistance made by some packers' are not being
met with much belief or sympathy, either, since beekeepers can find out the
facts. As always, some accounts are changing hands, and some, like
MacDonald's, are switching from honey to something else, but this last item
is due to concerns about honey quality in the wake of the Chinese
chlorampenicol recall (caused by their own policy of buying the cheapest),
not price. Apparently some packers are losing business, but others are doing
just fine. While some packers are complaining about the price, these others
are realizing that the (revenue) size of their business just doubled! Margins
may not be what they were, but the profits are still there for the smart ones
and will creep back up.
The current price bump is due to quality problems with Chinese honey.
In the near future, we are going to see increased demands for quality
assurance and smart beekeepers are starting to think about better record
keeping and diverting some of the windfalls of this past season towards
improving facilities and moving in the direction of HACCP. When the current
countervail actions wear off, the only factor that will keep prices up for
the beekeeper is quality assurance. Volume buyers and packers -- and their
insurance companies -- are going to want proof that what happened with
Chinese honey does not happen again.
In five years, I predict that beekeepers who cannot provide convincing
documentation of their management and handling practices may not be able to
sell honey in any developed country.
I spent the day working at my desk and tidying.
Today..Snow tapering off this morning.
Further accumulations 1 to 2 cm. Wind light. High minus 1. Tonight..Snow
redeveloping overnight. Wind north 30 km/h. Low minus 5. Normals for the
period..Low minus 13. High minus 1.
Sunday 9 February 2003
Last
year on this date Year 2001 on this date
Year 2000 on this date
Write me
I spent the day looking for some good investments and doing other research
When we sell all our bees, we'll have to invest the retirement funds. seems
that there are not a lot of secure, high paying investments out there right
now.
I also read some of Dewey Caron's Africanized Honey Bees in the Americas.
It's an excellent book; a half-hour with the book easily answers questions
that years on the internet have not satisfied.
I have been planning to go snowboarding and then out to BC and the coast for
a trip. When to go is the question. I was thinking of leaving first
thing tomorrow morning, but may leave later in the day or Tuesday.
Today..Cloudy with flurries. Wind northwest
20 km/h. High plus 1. Tonight..Cloudy with flurries. Wind increasing to north
30. Low minus 6. Normals for the period..Low minus 13. High minus 1.
<<
Previous Page
January 10th to 20th, 2003
Next Page >>
|
* * *
Travel Through Time -
Click here
* * *
- If you came here looking for
something specific, please scroll down, use your browser search (Ctrl+F), or look
here
-
- Is text on this page too large or small? Press "Ctrl" and
"+" or "Ctrl" and "-" at the same time to change it.- |
|
Do you have an ad blocker turned
on? Selected ads at right offer products and services related to topics on this
page.
|
|
Convert Currency |
Convert Measurements
Convert Celsius to Fahrenheit >
Chart
Calculator |
"If I make a
living off it, that's great -- but I come from a culture where you're valued
not
so much by what you acquire but by what you give away,"
-- Larry Wall (the inventor of Perl) |
Please report any problems or errors to Allen Dick
© allen dick 1999-2009.
Permission granted to copy in context for non-commercial purposes, and with
full attribution.
Home |
|