|

<<
Previous Page
November 10th to 19th, 2004
Next Page
>>
Those who can make you believe
absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
-- Voltaire --
Left panel on?
Yes
|
No
I'm just back from convention.
Hope to write it up soon.
Don't forget the US meetings coming up in January.
Southern Alberta canola pollination numbers, from
Medhat's talk, if I got this right...
2002 - 22,000 hives
2003 - 30,000 hives
2004 - 48,000hives
Thanks to pollination, Alberta now has about 250,000
hives. That makes us Number 3 in North America, after California and
Florida. Imagine how many we'd have if the border had not closed.
Wednesday : Sunny. Low minus 8. High minus 4.
A day at the
desk. Meijers and Purves-Smiths came for supper.
From BEE-L
discussion...
> Bob Harrison writes:
> With tens of thousands of hives crashing in the U.S. right
> now more than ever (from varroa resistant to both Apistan &
> Checkmite) do beekeepers need those bees & packages.
> Dee asks:
> Where are your figures coming from for this information or
> is this just a statement of your beliefs?
At the Alberta Beekeepers Association
meeting earlier this week, Lyle Johnston (AHPA president) indicated
that he suspects that there will be a loss of about 40% of US hives
between now and February. Bad news just keeps coming in. May US
beekeepers have relied on Apistan, then coumaphos. Now neither are
working.
Eric Mussen, at the same meeting,
says that in California, coumaphos is good for about two years, then
resistance develops.
Beekeepers are still not monitoring,
and many surprises await those who don't.
allen
|
Today : Sunny. High
7. /
Tonight : Clear. Low minus 13. /
Normals for the period : Low minus 8. High plus 4.
A day at the desk. Meijers and
Purves-Smiths came for supper.
> At the Alberta Beekeepers
Association meeting earlier this week, Lyle
> Johnston (AHPA president) indicated that he suspects that there
will
> be a loss of about 40% of US hives between now and February. Bad
> news just keeps coming in.
OK, I forgot. There is good news...
and some more bad...
Good News: Almond pollination is
looking like $75 this year and may hit $100 next.... And... There is
an opportunity for those who are in a position to split multiple
times and either sell nucs or packages. With packages at $35, a hive
split 8 times during a season would return $245 and still leave a
hive on the stand to repeat the next year.
This could work for Canadians, too,
since we can sell packages south. I sent several hundred packages to
Arizona in October many years back.
People not having mite trouble, and
in an area where such splitting is feasible, might be smart to
forget honey production and just produce bees for pollination,
since...
Bad News: ...honey may be headed back
to 60c. Countervail may be failing. Apparently Sioux Bee has pulled
back from a $135,000 commitment
Bad News: As for packages, there may
be a shortage in Canada this coming Spring, since the US can now buy
from Aus and NZ -- AFAIK. If there is a general collapse in the US,
there may be competition for any supplies available.
Good News: If you are an Australian
package producer, things look rosy
allen
|
Today : Sunny. High
9. /
Tonight : Clear. Low minus 14. /
Normals for the period : Low minus 8. High plus 4.
Another day working on the curriculum.
Ellen and Shirley went to an antique sale in Calgary.
> what would be pushing the price
> down in the USA and possibly Canada?
Good questions.
First, let me say that I am talking
worst-case, and that things may not work out the way we predict.
A sudden price decline is not a
certainty, although a number of things are falling into place for
such an eventuality over the next few years.
Many things can change, although the
huge sudden collapse of US bee populations is already well underway.
Chemicals are now failing everywhere, and many beekeepers did not
use the temporary respite they provided to get a sustainable program
working for them. Many STILL do not monitor their mite load! Some
are now going to high-dose fluvalinate - 10x the recommended - but
we all know that avenue is a dead end.
Anyhow...
The honey price in Canada will fall
far more than in the USA, since the Canadian dollar has been low
(saving our bacon over the past few years), but now is headed for
par with the US dollar. The loonie is already up 30% over the past
24 months from its all-time low. See
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=CADUSD=X&t=2y . The mitigating
factor for Canucks, though is that white honey should fall less than
the darker grades, and most of the Western Canadian crop is very
white.
> Are imports going to
> increase some how to drive the price down to consumers and
> beekeepers, or just beekeepers?
The talk of consumer resistance turns
out to have been just that, talk. Apparently retail sales are
healthy, although industrial grades did prove to be price-sensitive.
Industrial honey sales are expected to recover somewhat with lower
prices.
Retail packers, however, have gotten
used to an expanded business, and margins are back up. Their
locked-in expenses - and debts - have adjusted to the increased
dollar volume. None of them will want to see their businesses
shrink. They'll resist a retail price drop. Thus, the retail price
is expected to hold better than the producer price. We'll see, since
US packers may get hit by low-priced packaged imports, as the
Canadian packers were recently.
In the background, many new countries
are ramping up their bulk production, and, even if China learns to
eat their entire production, plus some, in the next decade, which I
predict, there are others like India and Brazil that have their eye
on the USA, and think that $US 1.00 per kilogram is a very
attractive price. (That is 45c/lb). Even with the US dollar dropping
like a stone, the price may not change much, since the major
culprits currently driving down honey prices in the USA - China and
Argentina - have their currency pegged to the US dollar.
> And if less bees used for
> less USA honey production with more used for pollination
> work, can you go deeper into specifics why what you said
> may be coming about?
Almond acreage is up, almond prices
are up, and the cost of bees as a portion of the return to growers -
even at $75 (or even $100) per set - is actually still quite low.
Growers know they need bees -- at least two hives per acre. Some are
wanting three for insurance, since the third colony will pay for
itself, plus some, although a third hive is not nearly as essential
as the first two.
Also see
http://honeycouncil.ca/users/folder.asp?FolderID=876&nID=445
Even if US producers quit honey
production entirely (will never happen) there will be little effect
on honey prices, since the imports set the price and the world
supply of honey is increasing.
Having said all that, don't panic. A
lot hinges on the next Argentine crop, due in February. They are now
out of white honey, and if they have a failure, then the price may
rebound.
For the long term the answer is in
quality assurance programs to differentiate North American honey
from competitors, and provide grounds to exclude many of the current
imports, on the basis of inadequate safety and sanitary precautions.
Canada is well on the way to having a program in place: C-BISQT, it
is called, short for Canadian Bee Industry Safety Quality and
Traceability program. The US has nothing (zero) happening on this
front, and I am told that many US beekeepers could not even meet the
standards in some third world countries with their present set-ups,
so it is not likely to happen soon. It is not even on the radar as
far as I can tell.
BTW, Lyle said the packer/importer
honey board will not happen, for various reasons, and, FWIW, he did
say some nice things about the current NHB.
Now, more than ever, it is important
to get out to the 2005 US National meetings. Info at
http://www.honeybeeworld.com/USmeetings/ .
Anyone who has been thinking of
coming to Alberta and hasn't made it yet, we're hoping to meet at
the Fantasyland Hotel in the world-famous West Edmonton Mall again
next year, so plan to attend.
allen
|
Today : Sunny. High
9. /
Tonight : A few clouds. Low minus 12. /
Normals for the period : Low minus 8. High plus 3.
Looks like another day working on
the curriculum, coming up.
Time to
upgrade to
a new free AVG virus checker. Here's where to
download 7.0. 6.0 is no longer as well supported and will lose all
support at year end.
I downloaded 7.0 and installed
it. All went well, but it took me some time to figure out how to turn
off the tag lines on incoming and outgoing mail and to turn off the little
popup nuisance that comes on when checking email on the server. It is all in
the e-mail scanner properties | configuration window. Turn of the
progress 'Notification' options and the 'Certify' options. Who wants a
'certified by' tag line on his email. Embarrassing!
Update is now automatic.
It's default is to pop up it starts checking, so I turned off the update
progress notification so that a popup window will not steal focus while I am
working.
Seems to me the scan is much
slower the new AVG took over an hour to scan my HD. I found it was
hogging resources, so turned down its priority a notch so I can work while
it is scanning. Anyhow, the new AVG works well, and I am grateful to
Grisoft, especially when I hear all the horror stories about Norton and
McAfee.
Today : A mix of
sun and cloud. High 11. /
Tonight : Cloudy. Low 3. / /
Normals for the period : Low minus 9. High plus 3.
Looks like another day working on
the curriculum, coming up.
It was. Another 10 hours.
A lot of the work is formatting and fiddling, it seems.
[quotes.shtml]
Today : Cloudy with sunny periods.
Wind becoming southwest 20 km/h this afternoon. High 14. /
Tonight : Cloudy periods. Low minus 4. /
Normals for the period : Low minus 9. High plus 3.
Looks like another day working on
the curriculum, coming up, and a trip to the accountant this afternoon.
|
From BEE-L
discussion... > Soft
controls have got limitations. Why commercial beekeepers are
> slow to embrace soft varroa controls. Control in U.S. tests generally
> falls around 70% for formic and thymol (ABJ 2004). Control can
> certainly be higher and can certainly be lower when weather problems
> and application problems happen.
Formic and oxalic in syrup have problems
handling infestations much over 5%, unless there is no brood present.
Period. That's the way it is.
Nonetheless, most beekeepers STILL do not
monitor their mite problems, and are expecting these treatments to work
miracles on the heavy infestations that catch them by surprise. They
will not.
Also, formic and oxalic drizzle work best
when no brood is present, and in some regions, that is a much shorter
window, with a much longer period of mite reproduction in between, than
the northern regions where these chemicals are working well.
Nonetheless, we have had a long time to
learn about mites and the various possibilities of managing them, but
many, if not most beekeepers have left the job to others.
We have had fluvalinate and coumaphos as
an emergency backup, and should have been using alternate controls and
monitoring as a frontline ,but regulators recommended using them as a
first line of defence, and now we are finding they are not working in
emergencies. (I have chronicled our minimal chemical regime on my diary.
Most of our overwintered hives had lower levels of varroa, 18 months
after treatment with a single Apistan(r) strip, than Australian packages
established this Spring!)
Oxalic evaporation shows promise, since
it works over a longer time period and can, reportedly, be repeated
without harm to the bees, but, in southern regions, we do not know if it
will do the job. Who knows? Apparently no one has tried. Officially, at
least.
> Formic is temperature dependant. In
many areas cold weather had set in > before the beekeeper discovered
their first attempt at control had > failed.
Actually, formic can work in cool
weather, as long as there are some warm days, which we see up here well
into October.
> ALSO when the first application was
done hives were approaching
> threshold. Add another four weeks of a failed control and hives
> with a lethal load of varroa & in most cases advanced PMS. Formic &
> thymol will not work as they provide slower over a period of time
> control unlike effective chemical strips which
> will clear a hive of varroa in a hurry WHEN varroa is not resistant
> to the strip.
That's the problem. People get used to
miracles and don't monitor.
> Both formic acid & thymol work best
when temperatures are ideal and > varroa is not at high levels.
Exactly
> Varroa tolerant bees are a reality but
in short supply. I have not
> a clue if the Weavers bees are varroa tolerant but I hope they are!
> His goals and mine are moving in the same direction so I wish the
> Weavers the best . If the Weavers bees do not prove to be varroa
> tolerant then beekeepers will not only not trust the Weavers but the
> rest of us saying we are indeed seeing varroa tolerant bees.
The problem is that your varroa resistant
bees may not do well in my area, nor mine in yours. Moreover, since the
tolerance depends on a rather fine balance of multiple factors, the
tolerance demonstrated in one region may not be apparent in another.
That may even be true from one operation to another in the same region,
since management methods and hive environment can vary dramatically.
> We want a survivor bee which will
tolerate varroa in all settings
> including large cell comb.
That's the problem.
We get lots of anecdotes about success in
special cases and with intensive, idiosyncratic management, however the
mammoth commercial bee/pollination industry in North America needs/wants
an all-purpose bee (or bees) that can be parachuted into existing
operations, in all regions, without a huge disruption, without
discarding all the existing equipment, and without complex management
requirements. (At this point, however, maybe all the existing equipment
has to go anyhow, since the beekeepers have themselves polluted it to
the point where it is toxic to bees).
At any rate, people are again expecting a
miracle - that tolerant bees will allow them to continue to ignore
advice to monitor and manage.
I predict that no matter how good the
tolerant bees turn out to be, that we will still have regular reports of
people being wiped out.
How long have we had AFB and simple
management methods to control and suppress it? We still hear of people
who let it get to the point where they have 50-100% outbreaks.
Monitor, monitor, monitor.
allen
allen dick wrote:
> (I have chronicled our minimal chemical
regime on my diary. Most of
> our overwintered hives had lower levels of varroa, 18 months after
> treatment with a single Apistan(r) strip, than Australian packages
> established this Spring!)
I should correct myself. I did the math
after posting and, they are actually the same, at a 0.5% average, if we
throw out the one outlier at 6.28%, or about double at a 1.1% average,
if we leave it in.
Of course the hives that died last winter
and those that were sold out of the lot last Spring are not considered.
They are gone. We are just looking at the ones that are here.
Such is the difficulty in trying to make
sense of things, but that is a different topic: How many neat scientific
study summaries fail to mention the hives that fell by the wayside and
anomalies discovered (and swept under the carpet?) on the way to that
conclusion?
allen |
Today : Clearing
this morning. High 8. /
Tonight : Clear. Low minus 4. /
Normals for the period : Low minus 9. High plus 3.
I
see Aaron won Beekeeper of the Year
I spent the day working o the
curriculum again. Seems the more I write, the more I find to write. I'm
almost done though. A lot of time has been spent fighting MS Word
and it's formatting.
Today : Sunny. Wind
west 20 km/h. High 7. /
Tonight : Clear. Low minus 10. //Normals for the period : Low minus 9. High plus 2.
I finished up this phase
of the curriculum and sent it in. There are still a few topics
to cover, and work to be done, but that's it for a while. The
job has been quite a bit of work and I've been putting in quite a
few hours lately. The break is quite a relief.
El & I went to Calgary to hear a
presentation on land investment, then did a bit of shopping.
Today :
Becoming cloudy late this morning. High 2. /
Tonight : Cloudy. 40 percent chance of flurries overnight. Low minus
9. /
Normals for the period : Low minus 10. High plus 2.
It's nice to have a day
to putter. I took out ashes and tidied up, paid bills, etc.
Jean and Mackenzie came for the day.
Today : Cloudy with
sunny periods. Clearing this afternoon. Wind northwest 20 km/h becoming light
this afternoon. High zero. /
Tonight : Increasing cloudiness early this evening. Clearing overnight. Low
minus 11. /
Normals for the period : Low minus 10. High plus 2.
<<
Previous Page
Next Page >>
|
Convert Currency |
Convert Measurements |
"If I make a
living off it, that's great -- but I come from a culture where you're valued not
so much by what you acquire but by what you give away,"
-- Larry Wall (the inventor of Perl) |
Please report any problems or errors to Allen Dick
© allen dick 1999-2003.
Permission granted to copy in context for non-commercial purposes, and with
full attribution.
Home |
|
| |
|